#MarshallMovie/@MarshallMovie Is Pro-#RapeCulture Joke

The upcoming movie, Marshall, is both sexist and misogynist.

In December 11, 1940, two truck drivers found Eleanor Strubing soaking wet and freshly rape. She named her attacker, chauffeur Joseph Spell, and he was quickly arrested. Joseph Spell even confessed. Then two MALE lawyers, Thurgood Marshall and Samuel Friedman, came swooping in and this is where the movie picks up:

Instead of showing the injustice of getting a rapist off, this movie is about “racism” or something.

I’m outraged! If Eleanor Strubing said she was raped, then she was raped! By depicting Joseph Spell, with his two very two MALE lawyers, getting off scot-free, is both misogynist and keeping alive the rape culture in America!

Of course, I am joking. While I would argue that Thurgood Marshall was a poor Supreme Court jurist, he was fighting racism in his own way and he was able to get an innocent man off fake rape charges. However making fun of the Oppression Olympics should be everyone’s duty.

I do have to say that the movie seems intellectually lazy. What is the message, that racism is bad? When is racism good? Will the movie address rape hoax?

While it would appear that racism is dying out (good!), it just goes to show that Rape Hoax is as old as time itself and isn’t going anywhere for now. Both rape and racism is evil, rightly so. However I have a dream when Rape Hoax is also consider just as evil as racism and rape.

Well, see ya’ later!


#HardcoreHenry/@HardcoreHenry Or “#FPS: The Movie” #Reaction/Discussion

I know for a fact that you sat there, clicking away at the game controller, and you wonder to yourself: “Man, there are enough cut scenes here that I wish this FPS game would just play itself.”

God clearly loves you. For your time has arrived, gamer. The outside world has ignored you for too long. You waited for a movie to call your own. DOOM came close, but it wasn’t the whole movie.

In the year 20XX, you are Henry. You got into an accident and you have been rebuilt. We clearly have the technology. And for the very low cost of six-million dollars. Better… Stronger… Faster…

*a man comes in and whispers in Gator’s ear about using copyrighted stuff*

Er… Okay, moving on. So you are rebuilt, by your wife who loves you very so much so that she forgets to give you a voice box, for reasons. Then some warlord comes out of the wood work, wants that technology for himself, and then kidnaps your wife. Now you, the silent hero, must wage war on the streets of Moscow (!) to get her back!

This is a pretty cool idea actually. This movie will only work if the POV does not change from Henry. Even a second out away from Henry would ruin this movie.

Hardcore Henry also comes to us from Russia. I am not one for boycotts and I don’t think any of the Russian oligarchs would like to see one of them portrayed as a warlord, so I say support it!

This is also a giant “Fuck You!” to the whole SJW movement. They hate the whole Damsel In Distress Trope and will scream at the top of their lungs when they see it. All the more reason to check it out.

Well, see ya’ later!


#KosKids: Loony Left Liberal Lying Liars!

I like to start a feature where I take a look at the distorted views of the clinically insane. Or more commonly known to us on the right-side of the blogosphere, as the KosKids. They are the dedicated and brain-dead followers of Markos Moulitsas, and they have bought some prime real estate at the bottom of the rabbit hole. This feature will take a look at how far down they have gone. I am going to link them, but I beg you don’t click on them.

Today we take a hard look at the Loony Left Liberal Lying Liars!

BBC: “UN panel “rules in Julian Assange’s favour'”

This writer, ask (Side Note: I fucking hate the handles of some of these KosKids.), just pretty much reprints the BCC and Julian Assange talking points.

What is amazing is the comments. There is clearly a divide in the SJW movement on Assange. One side clearly believes in Julian Assange claim he didn’t rape anyone and another side who thinks Assange is getting away with rape. Someone is clearly lying here and we had better find out who it is. Is Sweden making up rape charges? Or is Julian Assange lying about not raping someone?

A better, more popular, conservative writer would be able to fully benefit from this than me. Let’s file this interesting fact away for later.

Marco Rubio shows off his lying skills in abortion attack on Hillary Clinton

Laura Clawson accuses Marco Rubio of lying about Hillary Clinton’s stance on abortion. Okay, let us see what Marco Rubio said first:

“Hillary Clinton is an extremist on this issue,” the Florida Republican (Marco Rubio) said Thursday in New Hampshire. “She believes there should be no such thing as an illegal abortion — even on the due date.”

Here is what Hillary Clinton said about abortion:

“This is one of those really painful questions that people raise and obviously it’s really emotional,” (Sec. Hillary Clinton) began. “I think that the kind of late term abortions that take place are because of medical necessity.”

She concluded, “Therefore, I would hate to see the government interfering with that decision.

How dare Laura Clawson lie.

Sanders Caught Lying on Debate Stage

Speaking of presidential liars, cblodg hammers Senator Bernie Sanders for claiming an endorsement he never got. This is a pretty good catch for a brain-dead newt.

But honestly, what was Bernie Sanders thinking here? When communications is as fast as it is going to get with our level of technology, did anyone stop to think that this would not be checked on and found out?

Well, see ya’ later!


The Swamp #46

Pussy Crushing (Yes, I Went There)

The Swamp #46: Last Five! #Feminism! @AmandaPresto Guest!

The “Worst Podcast Ever” returns! …Only to go away in five episodes. Yeah, I is sad for no one, because no one listens to this awful garbage. But today we have Amanda Prestigiacomo on to talk about feminism and how awful it is right now. First we talk about the dumb Alpha Male Feminist. Then how feminism doesn’t want to raise women, but lower the bar for them or lower the bar for men. Then we talk about the real rape culture, Islam, and why isn’t feminists don’t want to talk about that.

Kat is unfortunately feeling a bit under the weather, so she’ll hopefully be back next week!


Meet The Most Annoying Feminists On The Planet. They’re Men. by Amanda Prestigiacomo

The Obama Administration Said It Wouldn’t Lower Combat Standards For Women. They Lied. by Michael Qazvini

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , ,

#PPact4Hillary: The Unholy #PPFA/@HillaryClinton Alliance

Yesterday, Hillary Clinton went full batshit crazy and called for the end to the Hyde Amendment:

Hillary calls for ending the Hyde Amendment and crowd goes wild!

Blood For The Blood God! Ellen L. Carmichael spells this out for us.

Why does @PPAct want funding for abortions? Because the number of abortions is decreasing and without subsidy, they’d be out of business. Hyde Amendment safeguards conscientious objection for Americans who find funding abortion morally objectionable. That’s how this works. Hillary Clinton wants taxpayers to fund abortion. This is a *very* extreme position and probably unconstitutional.

So, what is the Hyde Amendment? It bans the use of certain federal funds, specifically Medicaid, to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother. Since the Hyde Amendment are just riders on other funding bills, we have to keep passing a version every time we pass a funding bill.

Liberals and progressives want to end the Hyde Amendments so they can have abortion on demand, on the taxpayers’ dime. I am sure that the Journal Of (So-Called) Medical Ethics would be on board for taxpayer funded Infanticide too:

It might be maintained that ‘even allowing for the more optimistic assessments of the potential of Down’s syndrome children, this potential cannot be said to be equal to that of a normal child’. But, in fact, people with Down’s syndrome, as well as people affected by many other severe disabilities, are often reported to be happy.

Nonetheless, to bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care.

On these grounds, the fact that a fetus has the potential to become a person who will have an (at least) acceptable life is no reason for prohibiting abortion. Therefore, we argue that, when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.

Like Ellen Carmichael said, this is the extreme position and they must be defeated at the ballot box. There is no walking back from this position. The people of America must be shown that supporting this nonsense puts blood on their hands.

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , , , , ,

#RanaElmir/@ACLUofMichigan Deputy Director: “Condemn #Terrorism? I Refuse!”

We keep hearing that moderate American Muslims do indeed condemn Islamic Terrorism, or Terrorism for that matter, and we just don’t hightlight it. Fair enough, here is Rana Elmir ACLU of Michigan Deputy Director:

I emphatically refuse.

Well, there you have it. Out of the mouth of a modern, moderate, American Muslim. I don’t recommend reading the rest of the article, because it is an “Muslims Are The Real Victims!” diatribe.

Please. Give me a break. Christian homes and churches are torched or bombed by Muslims everyday, and hundreds of Christians, including priests, pastors, nuns, and other church workers are murdered at the hands of Islamic extremists. Justification varies from that of apostasy or evangelism to reported “blasphemy” or “insulting” Islam. Many have even been hacked to death by devout Muslims over cartoons. The horrors visited upon Christians include discrimination, kidnapping, rape, torture, mutilation, and outright murder. So spare me the Muslim Victim Card, I don’t have time for it.

For Islam, violence is a matter of course:

The context of violent passages (in the Qur’an) is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God. Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book’s call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Their apologists cater to these preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad’s own martial legacy, along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the [Qur’an], have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.

And lying is also a standard operating procedure for Islam:

Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to “smooth over differences.”

There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them. …

Taken collectively (from the Qur’an and Hadith) these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be “compelled” to deceive others for a greater purpose.

So yeah, I am HIGHLY suspicious of Muslims and for good reason. They follow a “religion” that peaches violence and lying as part of their belief system. How can I trust any of them?

But unlike Rana Elmir, I will fully condemn terrorism in all forms. Anyone who visits violence on any Muslim, just because, is wrong and I want no part of it. Anyone who does Evil In God’s Name, only hurts God. However make no mistake, I will not allow a Muslim (or other Christians or Atheists or Jews or Hindus) to visit violence upon me or others.

So Rana Elmir (a modern, moderate, American Muslim) refuses to condemn terrorism for reasons. Fair enough. It is her First Amendment right to do so. I am disappointed, but then what do you expect from ACLU members and the so-called Religion Of Peace?

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Swamp #39

We. Will. Be. Heard! (As Well As The Don…)

The Swamp #39: #Tribalism, #Trumpism, #SciFiGate, @LincolnFarish Guest!

Worst Podcast Ever” Loser (winning?) starts out today’s podcast starts off talking about Tribalism and how it is effecting the 2016. Then we talk about Trumpisms and wonder how The Don is defying political gravity. Kat has some good theories. I like Kat, she helps me fill up my “Reads” section!

Then I have on Lincoln Farish talk Sad Puppies and the end of the Hugo Awards. But before you listen, check out my Patreon Page!


Donald Trump and the War on the Brains of the Right by Robert Tracinski

No Movement That Embraces Trump Can Call Itself Conservative by Jonah Goldberg

Trump Has Succeeded in Convincing Conservatives to Discard their Principles Overnight by Charles C. W. Cooke

Your next president, Donald Trump, basically tweets like a 12-year old by Amber Phillips

Donald Trump: I Wasn’t Talking About Carly Fiorina’s Face by CNN

Donald Trump Calls Michelle Malkin A’Dummy,’ Malkin Fires Back By Calling Him A Fake Conservative by Josh Feldman (2012)

(Auto Video) Fans boo Trump’s US Open arrival by ESPN

Well, see ya’ later!


#PPSellsBabyParts: Newest #PPFA Offenses

This story just might break me.

Horrific. Friend Moe Lane makes a painful connection:

And, just when I thought that I couldn’t be more disgusted by this story, comes this honestly chilling observation from a RedState commenter.

Now we see why they are so vehemently opposed to 20 week abortion bans: it doesn’t give the involuntary organ donor enough time to grow. Monsters.

…Which would handily explain why Planned Parenthood fights the twenty-week ban, despite the fact that it has such broad support, yes? We all thought that it was based on some sort of twisted principle. Turns out it’s just that you can make a decent hunk of change off of harvesting baby parts. No sense just throwing out that money with the rest of the… stuff… right, Dr. Deborah Nucatola?

Yeah, I am done. The time for debate is over. It is time we start throwing people in jail and taking money away from Plan Parenthood. The “reimbursements” and “a humanitarian undertaking” spin doesn’t even pass the smell test. Even so, “good intentions” is not a defense in breaking the law. We make human organ chop shops illegal for a reason.

I am beyond disgusted. We allowed this to happen. Turned a blind eye. I want to leave you a quote, slightly altered, that expresses how I feel at this moment:

“It is not God who kills the unborn. Not fate that slices them up or destiny that feeds them to PPFA’s coffers. It’s us. Only us.”

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , , , , ,

#AbortionDrone Is Now A Thing

I am disgusted beyond words. I can’t link to any article about this story, because they all disgustingly approve of this utter nonsense.

Basically, Poland is a pro-life nation. It has abortion only in the case of rape/incest or the when the life of the mother is threaten. That seems fair to me. However Feminists and SJWs are not happy about this, because anything less than unlimited genocide of the next generation is consider wrong for some reason. So a pro-abortion group “Women On Waves” says “fuck Poland’s natural sovereignty” and is sending, from Germany, outlawed drugs into Poland using drones. I am sure Germany wouldn’t like people in Poland breaking German laws. So much for the rule-of-law in Europe.

Well, see ya’ later!


Yes @zblay, #RachelDolezal And #CaitlynJenner Is The Same Thing

Meet Zeba Blay. She does logical gymnastics in order to convince you that Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner are not the same thing. My job today is to explain how Blay basically does and ends up making the case against both. Let’s break down the insanity.

And yet, despite overwhelming criticism, some commentators have questioned whether (Rachel) Dolezal has done anything wrong. Many have pointed to her living as a black woman as an example of something known as #transracial identity, even comparing Dolezal’s story to Caitlyn Jenner’s transition.

But let’s make one thing clear: transracial identity is not a thing.

Thing is, I agree with Zeba Blay. Transracial isn’t an identity. On the gripping hand, Blay uses “transracial” as the only term when referring to Rachel Dolezal and it is clear I need to define a few terms here. I want to note that I am not a SJW and I did my research more than she did!

Transracial – A person that is born one race, but can fit into multiple races through their actions. For example, I love the Japanese people and their culture (this is a true fact of me). I understand and get them. If I had the money, I deck out my room with some stuff from Japan. I love their movies and I am a huge anime fan, strictly subtitle guy (even if I can’t fully understand Japanese yet). If I had the time to learn their language fully, I could move to Japan for a visit and fit right in (maybe). I am not deluded enough to think I am actually Japanese.

Transethnic – A person who feels that they should be from a different ethnicity. This is, for example, Rachel Dolezal. Something has happen and Rachel thinks she is black. As Zeba Blay rightly pointed out later on, it was a fantasy taken to unhealthy levels.

Just as something has happen to Bruce Jenner to think he is now Caitlyn Jenner.

The idea that Dolezal’s choice to publicly identify as a black woman — one who occupied positions of power in spaces specifically designated for members of a marginalized group — is the same as being a trans woman, simply doesn’t add up.

How? Aren’t white women just as much a “marginalized group” according to SJW Logic as black women or black people in general?

What Dolezal did is culturally appropriative,…

Fuck me. “Cultural Appropriation” is such a retarded thing. Other people have been able to more effectively debunk cultural appropriation myth, that I am just going to just embed this great video:

…and suggesting otherwise disrupts actual discussions about transgender identity and issues.

I agree with Zeba Blay. If you reject Transethnic, you must also reject Transgender. That is why Blay tries desperately tries to uncouple them by describing how one is right and one is wrong, but jumps through all kinds of hoops to do so. I would also like to point out that Blay only tries to debunk Transethnic and not defend Transgender in any meaningful way. Let’s start, shall we.

As Darnell L. Moore of Mic eloquently put it, “In attempting to pass as black, Dolezal falsely represented her identity. Trans people don’t lie about their gender identities – they express their gender according to categories that reflect who they are.”

Racial divisions may ultimately be a construct, Moore notes, but “skin color is hereditary.” And it’s skin color that primarily determines racial privilege, and the way others in the world interact with your racial identity.

Right, and gender is not hereditary? They have yet to find the Transgender chromosome yet. I breathlessly wait the day that Transgender woman gets pregnant. For fun let’s substitute “sex” for “skin color” and “gender” with “racial” in that last line and see if it makes sense.

“And it’s sex that primarily determines gender privilege, and the way others in the world interact with your gender identity.”

Ops. It does.

[Transethnic] identity is a concept that allows white people to indulge in blackness as a commodity, without having to actually engage with every facet of what being black entails — discrimination, marginalization, oppression, and so on.

I agree.

However doesn’t Transgender allow men and women to indulge in gender as a commodity? Bruce Jenner has always been a guy. If you believe in “white male privilege”, then he has never been discriminate, marginalized, or oppressed when Jenner was a man.

Now I anyone should be able to hold a reasonable opinion on anything. SJW Logic says your opinion is only right, if you hold the right opinion. Your right opinion holds more water if you are a part of the “marginalized” class. I am just pointing out how dumb this argument is right now.

It plays into racial stereotypes, and perpetuates the false idea that it is possible to “feel” a race.

Just like it is possible to “feel” a gender? See my point?

As a white woman, Dolezal retains her privilege; she can take out the box braids and strip off the self-tanner and navigate the world without the stigma tied to actually being black. Her connection to racial oppression is something she has complete control over, a costume she can put on — and take off — as she pleases.

Caitlyn Jenner can also figure out that being a woman is not all it is crack up to be, and can return to being Bruce Jenner with as much effort as it took to become Caitlyn.

Dolezal’s delusion and commitment to living as a black woman is profound. And it’s inherently wrong. The implications of a white woman, donning blackness and then using that blackness in order to navigate black spaces is offensive.

Bruce Jenner, donning womanhood and then could use that womanhood in order to navigate woman spaces too.

And comparing her life to Caitlyn Jenner’s is an insult to Jenner’s personal struggle. “I’m not doing this to be interesting. I’m doing this to live,” she told Vanity Fair.

Right. Hey, you plan on watching “I Am Cati” when it comes out July 26?

Dolezal is not trying to survive. She’s merely indulging in the fantasy of being “other.”

So is Bruce Jenner’s fantasy of being a woman. As we have established, both gender and ethnicity is hereditary. You cannot “mentally will” yourself new genetics. Transgender, Transablism, and now Transethnic are all fantasies/obsessions taken to mentally unhealthy levels. The World Health Organization classifies Transgender as a mental disorder, because of that underlying fantasy/obsession.

Anorexia Nervosa is mental disorder too, because there is an unhealthy mental fantasy/obsession about being skinny. I don’t see people rushing to make anorexia acceptable (yet… I hope…).

I am not trying to marginalize anyone here. On the contrary, these people are crying out for help and letting them indulge in unhealthy mental fantasy/obsession is not helpful. Shaming or locking people up is not the answer. We need to develop respectful mental health treatments for Transgender, Transablism, and Transethnic people before this gets out of control. I just hope it is not too late.

Well, see ya’ later!

Theme: WordPress Webdesign
(Note: Website No Longer Works. Removing Link.)