#PPact4Hillary: The Unholy #PPFA/@HillaryClinton Alliance

Yesterday, Hillary Clinton went full batshit crazy and called for the end to the Hyde Amendment:

Hillary calls for ending the Hyde Amendment and crowd goes wild!

Blood For The Blood God! Ellen L. Carmichael spells this out for us.

Why does @PPAct want funding for abortions? Because the number of abortions is decreasing and without subsidy, they’d be out of business. Hyde Amendment safeguards conscientious objection for Americans who find funding abortion morally objectionable. That’s how this works. Hillary Clinton wants taxpayers to fund abortion. This is a *very* extreme position and probably unconstitutional.

So, what is the Hyde Amendment? It bans the use of certain federal funds, specifically Medicaid, to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother. Since the Hyde Amendment are just riders on other funding bills, we have to keep passing a version every time we pass a funding bill.

Liberals and progressives want to end the Hyde Amendments so they can have abortion on demand, on the taxpayers’ dime. I am sure that the Journal Of (So-Called) Medical Ethics would be on board for taxpayer funded Infanticide too:

It might be maintained that ‘even allowing for the more optimistic assessments of the potential of Down’s syndrome children, this potential cannot be said to be equal to that of a normal child’. But, in fact, people with Down’s syndrome, as well as people affected by many other severe disabilities, are often reported to be happy.

Nonetheless, to bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care.

On these grounds, the fact that a fetus has the potential to become a person who will have an (at least) acceptable life is no reason for prohibiting abortion. Therefore, we argue that, when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.

Like Ellen Carmichael said, this is the extreme position and they must be defeated at the ballot box. There is no walking back from this position. The people of America must be shown that supporting this nonsense puts blood on their hands.

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , , , , ,

#PPSellsBabyParts: Newest #PPFA Offenses

This story just might break me.

Horrific. Friend Moe Lane makes a painful connection:

And, just when I thought that I couldn’t be more disgusted by this story, comes this honestly chilling observation from a RedState commenter.

Now we see why they are so vehemently opposed to 20 week abortion bans: it doesn’t give the involuntary organ donor enough time to grow. Monsters.

…Which would handily explain why Planned Parenthood fights the twenty-week ban, despite the fact that it has such broad support, yes? We all thought that it was based on some sort of twisted principle. Turns out it’s just that you can make a decent hunk of change off of harvesting baby parts. No sense just throwing out that money with the rest of the… stuff… right, Dr. Deborah Nucatola?

Yeah, I am done. The time for debate is over. It is time we start throwing people in jail and taking money away from Plan Parenthood. The “reimbursements” and “a humanitarian undertaking” spin doesn’t even pass the smell test. Even so, “good intentions” is not a defense in breaking the law. We make human organ chop shops illegal for a reason.

I am beyond disgusted. We allowed this to happen. Turned a blind eye. I want to leave you a quote, slightly altered, that expresses how I feel at this moment:

“It is not God who kills the unborn. Not fate that slices them up or destiny that feeds them to PPFA’s coffers. It’s us. Only us.”

Well, see ya’ later!

Written by BigGator5 in: Politics | Tags: , , , , , , ,

#AbortionDrone Is Now A Thing

I am disgusted beyond words. I can’t link to any article about this story, because they all disgustingly approve of this utter nonsense.

Basically, Poland is a pro-life nation. It has abortion only in the case of rape/incest or the when the life of the mother is threaten. That seems fair to me. However Feminists and SJWs are not happy about this, because anything less than unlimited genocide of the next generation is consider wrong for some reason. So a pro-abortion group “Women On Waves” says “fuck Poland’s natural sovereignty” and is sending, from Germany, outlawed drugs into Poland using drones. I am sure Germany wouldn’t like people in Poland breaking German laws. So much for the rule-of-law in Europe.

Well, see ya’ later!


#HungerStrike4Life: Pass The #20WeekAbortionBan Already!

Starting this Monday, June 1st, I will be going on a #HungerStrike4Life, which will be my way to stand up against abortion and show support for the 20-Week Abortion Ban. This is a pro-life protest, so this is not an open-ended “until the bill passes or I die” protest. It will last 7-days and I will start eating solid foods again on June 8th. This is just my way of showing solidarity and to show how much this means to me. I have been thinking and praying about this for months, and this just makes complete sense for me. A hunger strike is not for everyone and I don’t think everyone should do it, I am also not encouraging anyone to do this too. In fact, I encourage you to go to Personhood USA and learn how to volunteer in your state. I will be doing a VLog, so please subscribe to my YouTube Channel for all the updates. Email me a question for the AMA videos.

For this hunger strike I will only take water, fat-free nonalcoholic drinks, and vitamins (since they are a supplement and not replacement for actual food). I will not be drinking soda since that is so full of sugar that I feel like that would be cheating.

(Read) HR36: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act

I know this bill is imperfect. I like to see abortion banned outright (with the “rape” and “life of the mother” exception). But this is a step in the right direction. I rather see abortions become more rare and not the whole-sale slaughter going on right now.

Poll, after poll, after poll shows Americans support the 20-Week Abortion Ban in clear majorities. Sen. Mitch McConnell should bring the bill to a vote and get Democrats on the record as the heartless monsters that they are.

Well, see ya’ later!


Hey @Nate_Cohn, Just Like #RoeVWade Settled The #Abortion Debate?

Nate Cohn has an asinine article up on the NY Times. I am going to do little more than link it, other than to say that that Nate thinks the GOP will just roll-over if the Supreme Court makes SSM the law of the land. That’s laughable on its face and he knows it. Did conservatives just roll-over and play dead on abortion after Roe V Wade?!

In fact, I dare say Roe V Wade is the biggest conservative cause célèbre right now. Justice Ginsburg would agree with me:

(Justice Ruth Bader) Ginsburg told an audience Saturday at the University of Chicago Law School that while she supports a woman’s right to choose, she feels the ruling by her predecessors on the court was too sweeping and gave abortion opponents a symbol to target. Ever since, she said, the momentum has been on the other side, with anger over Roe fueling a state-by-state campaign that has placed more restrictions on abortion.

“That was my concern, that the court had given opponents of access to abortion a target to aim at relentlessly,” she told a crowd of students. “…My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum that was on the side of change.” …

Ginsburg would have rather seen the justices make a narrower decision that struck down only the Texas law that brought the matter before the court. That law allowed abortions only to save a mother’s life.

A more restrained judgment would have sent a message while allowing momentum to build at a time when a number of states were expanding abortion rights, she said. She added that it might also have denied opponents the argument that abortion rights resulted from an undemocratic process in the decision by “unelected old men.”

Ginsburg told the students she prefers what she termed “judicial restraint” and argued that such an approach can be more effective than expansive, aggressive decisions.

You guys should listen to her now, but you won’t. I can see it now:

The first step will be to protect churches/temples/mosques and their clergy who still believe in traditional marriage. The next step is to defend Free Speech of people and businesses who support traditional marriage. Then while you genocide your young through abortion (like you have been doing for the last 40 years), we will still be popping out pro-traditional marriage babies out in mom and pop families. Oh I am sure that in the short term, some GOP politicians will pander to SSM. However I don’t think that pandering will last long. When the rot sets in on SSM (like it has with the bloody butchering of the unborn), we will shove this ugly face of SSM and tell the American people we were right all along. Like abortion, we’ll poke holes in your arguments until the whole thing comes crashing down.

So yeah, I hope the Supreme Court knocks themselves out. We the fearless defenders of traditional marriage will endure without yielding. Just as long as we are with God, all things are possible.

Well, see ya’ later!

Theme: TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Webdesign
(Note: Website No Longer Works. Removing Link.)